‘Habitat’ the most powerful stimuli which effect the strategy of individual thoughts and conduct
‘Habitat’ the most powerful stimuli which effect the strategy of individual thoughts and conduct. Individual’s bordering highly influence the motif of their thinking, dynamism, traits and idiosyncrasy. Each individual faces difficulties and tough time in their lives but the way they reciprocate are highly construct by their parents and surrounding. Just as the existence of living soul is highly pretentious by their environment the same way the individual who born in prosper environment will throw them to live their life in luxuries as they do not have face any difficulty in their starting life’s mainly they live their life’s as an independent individuals, the establishment of positive traits were found less in them as compared to the individuals who born in the time of recession (to whom there is almost no availability of primary or basic requirements). Everyone is busy in their own lives and their own problems so, mostly our elders in their later phases of life feel isolated and are unable to talk about their complications to others, in last they take of more tension which effect their mental and physical fitness, mostly their attitude towards their life is negative which suggests that the attitude towards their life is negative. While comparing previous generations with today’s young generations, today’s young generation have more socially connected they have more friends to which they share their own problems they do not take as much as stress take by the previous generations or elders so, the attitude of today’s young generation towards life is mostly positive and if they face any trouble in their lives so, with the assistance of family and kin’s they are able to grasp over that unpleasant situation. Mainly the previous generations experienced their life as an independent the social networking is not either that much broad they mostly resolve their own problems without any one’s succour they also considered him/her self as a dominant and does not relaying on others for problem solving or decision making. Nowadays, as we seen our parents they mostly ordered their child’s to obey their orders and in mostly cases they denied child’s decision even in child’s own life, parents selected any vocation for their child’s, without child’s involvement they took important steps of their life to show his/her superiority they have upon their children’s. As result, the child’s life overall contingent on their parents life even in a small settlements they need permission from their parents and all other family members ascribe to which they defined himself in the concept of ‘we’ phenomena rather than ‘me’. The time period in which an individual was born had a huge influence on the method of their thinking style, personality and in the development of positive traits.
Study disclosed, relationship between age groups with resilience is mild positive, which shows that along the age the resiliency in human beings tend to increase. In narcissism case the relationship between narcissism and age is discover to be negative which specifies that two variables are inversely proportional as increase in age the narcissism tends to reduce. Study also shown, there are somehow increase in vanity and entitlement in age groups (narcissism scale factors).
Study also reveals that the level of resiliency in previous generation i.e, Xennials were found higher in them as compared to Millennials, while compared with Generation Z the level of resilience were found less in Xennials. While compare Millennials with Generation Z the level of resilience were found less in them which let out that today’s young generation were found to be more resilient as compared to the prior generations.
Narcissism also negatively correlated with all of three generation which point out the presence of inverse linkage betwixt narcissism and generations. A very small increase in narcissism quantity as we shift from one generation to other.
Study divulged, age groups and resilience are in mild positive relation which also supports our hypothesis that age groups affects the level of resiliency, as we moved from generation to generation there is a significant changes occur in level of resilience. Study also concluded that there is a mild negative relationship between age groups and narcissism level which also supports our hypothesis that age groups have impact on the level of narcissism, as we shift from one generation to next the level of narcissism tends to decrease which reveals ‘the ability to bounce back or positive attitudes towards life tends to increase as we shift from one generation to next’. While comparing all (three) generations the study concluded that Gen Z were found more resilient also the prospect of decreased in narcissism become increased which also supports our alternative hypothesis that I Gen is more resilient and found to be less narcissistic than Millennial and Xennial. Also the relationship between Generation Z and narcissism is low negative as well as with resilience is mildly positive which proves that their is existence of relationship between Generation Z and resiliency. Study also concludes, narcissism is very low negative correlated with Millennials which indicates the relation exist but inverse and very low as we shift from Xennials to Millennials narcissism become decline but not much as Xennials and Generation Z which supports our hypothesis that Millennial are more narcissist than Xennials and I Gen also, when compare Millennials with other generations the level of resiliency is mild positive but has been found less as compared to the other two generation which also proves our hypothesis that Millennials are less resilient generation than Xennials and Generation Z. Also the presence of very low negative relation towards narcissism and mild positive relation with resilience which demonstrate a significant relationship between Millennials, narcissism and resilience. Study also reveals, the level of narcissism is mild negative correlated with Xennials which indicates as we shift from previous generation to Xennials, the degree of narcissism tends to dwindle in mild level but when we compare their mild negative correlation with Millennials (very low negative correlation with narcissism) and Generation Z (low negative correlation with narcissism) it has been found that Xennials are less narcissist than Millennials but are more narcissist than Generation Z which supports our alternative hypothesis that Xennials were more narcissist than Generation Z and less narcissist than Millennials. As we compare the results of Xennials on resiliency with Millennials and Generation Z results it has been found that Xennials are more resilience than Millennials and less resilient than Generation Z which proves our alternative hypothesis that Xennials be obvious more resilient than Millennials and less resilient than Generation Z. Also study disclose, mild positive relation that has been found between resilience and Xennials also mild negative association between narcissism and Xennilas which manifest that relationship prevailing between Xennials, narcissism and resilience.